Su Baynes confido che il ragazzone abbia voglia di sgomitare ancora in canotta verde e sappia adeguare le sue richieste alle nostre possibilità

Più che altro spero che per la prossima stagione Yabusele metta su un po' di massa perché l'ho visto piuttosto magretto!

Sembrava di avere in panchina 2 Sullinger...

Io penso che Ainge offrirà a Smart 10mln (che non sono pochi) e sono la via di mezzo tra la QO e il massimo cui può ambire di 13-14mln. Confido che lui accetti con entusiasmo.

Su Morris sono del partito "vada altrove" ma non ne farei una tragedia se restasse.

Su Rozier sono del partito "celtic a vita" e ne farei una tragedia se partisse

Su Baynes confido che il ragazzone abbia voglia di sgomitare ancora in canotta verde e sappia adeguare le sue richieste alle nostre possibilità

Play-by-play announcer says Celtics could explore Irving trade

Could the Boston Celtics explore a trade? One legendary play-by-play announcer believes so.

According to Mike Gorman, who has served as the Boston Celtics' play-by-play announcer for over 30 years, believes the possibility of trading Irving is a real one and that general manager Danny Ainge would pull off such a deal in exchange for the New Orleans Pelicans' Anthony Davis, as he relayed on the Celtics beat podcast on CLNS Media Network:

“Certainly, if you’re going to trade Kyrie you get excited because there’s a whole lot coming back,” Gorman told host Evan Valenti on the Celtics Beat Podcast on CLNS Media Network. “Danny [Ainge] doesn’t like to put the untouchable label on anybody. I do think [Jayson] Tatum is untouchable myself.

“It would take some unbelievable offer to get him away from Boston right now. But I think everyone else is in play, to some degree.”

“Again, if you’re talking about the big guy from New Orleans [Davis] then you’re going to have to be talking about a really really, good player going back the other way,” Gorman said. “And that’s the only other player that the Celtics really would put everyone on the table for.”

Gorman further backs up his claim by stating that Irving's injury history is a concern for Celtics management moving forward. That's why the possibility of a trade is on the table considering Irving was limited to just 60 games due to a prior knee injury that required surgery.

“I think Kyrie’s record over the course of his career would tell you that injuries have been a problem,” Gorman said. “I think you have to be smart here and look at what the facts are, and understand that they may be a problem going forward, too.”

“You’d like to see Kyrie, who’s in a contract year next year, to have the season of his career,” he said. “I think the big measurement for Kyrie going forward is how many games can you reasonably get out of him.”

This really isn't a far-fetched possibility when you think about it. Ainge shows no loyalty to his players when it comes to business and he traded Isaiah Thomas almost immediately after it was determined Thomas would miss the first half of the regular season due to a serious hip injury. It also happened in the offseason directly after Thomas led the Celtics to the No. 1 seed and the Eastern Conference Finals.

Considering Boston's success without Irving, heck, they made it to Game 7 of the East Finals without him, combined with 's success as the starting point guard, why wouldn't Boston consider a deal for Irving? Especially if they can get a dominant big man in return, you're talking about a guy like Davis paired with young bucks such as , and to go along with and probably ?

While it would take a heck of a trade package to trade Irving, it's still a possibility.

e che ritorno c'è nel tradare kyrie?scade prossima estate(po).davis da noi firma, irving a NO?

NO chiederebbe ben altra tipologia di giocatore.assolutamente no sense.

Rinunciare a Irving mi sembra assurdo.
Personalmente, preferirei rinunciare ad Hayward.