il mese di marzo è davvero molto impegnativo (ma abbiamo iniziato bene!) con 15 partite in 30 giorni e ci attende una lunga trasferta ad ovest con 6 partite in 10 giorni.
GO CELTICS

Gio 2 marzo vs Cleveland W
Sab 4 marzo vs Brooklyn 1:30
Lun 6 marzo vs New York 1:30
Mar 7 marzo @ Cleveland 1:00
Gio 9 marzo vs Portland 1:30
Dom, 12 marzo @ Atlanta 1:30
Mar 14 marzo @ Houston 1:00
Gio 16 marzo @ Minnesota 1:00
Sab 18 marzo @ Portland 3:00
Dom, 19 marzo @ Utah 02:00
Mer 22 marzo @ Sacramento 3:00
Sab 25 marzo vs Indiana 00:00
Lun 27 marzo vs San Antonio 00:00
Mer 29 marzo @ Washington 1:00
Ven, 31 marzo @ Milwaukee 1:30
Sab 1 aprile vs Utah 1:30

Bob Ryan ha seguito i Boston Celtics dagli anni settanta, da quando Tommy Heinsohn era coach e dovrebbe essere il giornalista di Boston più anziano, motivo per cui, quando ha affermato nel podcast Celtics Lab che crede che questa versione dei Celtics sia la più profonda che possa ricordare nel corso della sua lunga carriera, dovremmo credergli.
Oppure, consigliargli del fosforo.

L' importante è che sia vincente.

mmmh la squadra con irving ed hayward aveva una profondità e una quantità di talento spropositata.

e anche i big three, 2008, più rondo perk, house, posey, e via dicendo.

Può anche essere, ma alla fine quello che conta davvero è che quei 7/8 effettivi della rotazione da playoff siano sani e in forma.

insomma la 2008 era una squadra con 6-7 effettivi e poi 4-5 ragazzi che potevano all'occorrenza dare qualcosa...
io penso che due giocatori come Brogdon e White dalla panchina non li abbiamo MAI avuti
sono meglio di Posey e House ma senza discussione (c'era pure Cassell)
e ci avanza un Pritchard

Poi, chiedo: tra Grant, Kornet e Muscala arriviamo a mettere assieme un PJBrown, un Leon Powe e un Big Baby Davis?
forse sì
e avanza ancora un Hauser ...

Ryan non ha detto nulla di troppo distante dalla realtà...

Il 15esimo poi potrebbe essere uno tra Valentine, Snell o Samanic... non uno Scott Pollard qualsiasi

Valentine ha più militanza con i Maine
Snell sembrerebbe essere arrivato apposta per ambientarlo al verde del New England
Samanic meriterebbe un riconoscimento dopo la stagione di GLeague che ha avuto ed è il più futuribile di tutti

Per esperienza sua, e mia nell'averlo visto contro, dico Snell senza il minimo dubbio.
Al di là dell' identikit fatto da padre Brad, che magari da Ainge ha imparato a dirla qualche bugia, Barton non mi sarebbe dispiaciuto per nulla.

la squadra del 2008 aveva i big già esperti di loro, e poi veterani con palle fumanti, i perfetti veterani che in questo momento non abbiamo trovato invece, primariamente house e e pj, poi il buon powe e c'era anche tony allen che rimane un grosso rimpianto vista la carriera che si è costruito.

c'era qualche bravo ragazzo in meno, per certo e torniamo alla domanda che vi avevo fatto sul clima molto amichevole che vige nel nostro spogliatoio, magari un po' di tensione in più, quella giusta, avrebbe aiutato a non perdere certe partite.

alla fine ci giocheremo il primo posto per le sconfitte contro orlando, bulls, thunder e ora i nets(che statisticamente dovevano tornare a vincere con noi)

poi secondo me c'è il discorso timelord da affrontare, perchè se anche sto anno ce lo portiamo ai po malconcio, una si una no e gioca al 60%, purtroppo e ripeto purtroppo si devono prendere deicsioni impopolari, a mio modo di vedere.

nessuno più dello staff medico dei celtics può sapere le sue condizioni fisiche e ipotizzare il suo futuro da giocatore quale potrà essere.

anche Marial Shayok potrebbe essere il 15esimo, con i Maine tira quasi il 50% da 3 e se i nostri destini passano da quel dato lì, tanto vale ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmWMgbx2egY

son comunque nomi che a meno di exploit incredibili, non porteranno nulla nel concreto, a mio modesto parere.

come penso che ai po non si esca dalle rotazioni a otto giocatori, smart, white, brogdon, tatum, brown, horford, granito, timelord.

a cui magari a turno potrebbe aggiungersi un hauser ed un lungo se timelord avesse i suoi acciacchi.

La sconfitta dei Bucks mi ha spinto a sbirciare la classifica, cosa che non faccio praticamente mai.
Fosse questa quella finale, vorrebbe dire Heat al primo turno e, probabilmente, Sixers al secondo.....

...
......
...........
.....................

Non si era detto lo scorso anno: mai più calcoli?

faranno bene a farli loro i calcoli...

Brogdon ha detto che l'aspettativa è di andare 6-0 in trasferta

le stats di Mazzulla in un bell'editoriale intitolato
By the numbers: ’s analytics spreadsheet



The Celtics head coach talks a lot about advanced metrics, but how has he applied them to the 2022-2023 Celtics?

By Harris Rubenstein

“Advanced analytics” is a bit of a funny phrase. In the basketball world, it’s about as broad a phrase as you can find to explain the modern-day basketball revolution. It covers everything from player tracking data to minute shooting stats to ’s rebounding percentage (11.2% in 2022-23, lowest of his career btw).

For , it has been the gas in the engine for his first year as head coach. As you go back through his quotes and press conferences, there have been some specific analytics he’s pointed to that have had a real impact on their game strategy. Let’s go through five data points Mazzulla has mentioned in the past that he looks at when helping pick this team up.

Open Threes
As Coach Mazzulla has said in the past, “I love open threes” and it’s important to understand what he exactly means. There are different levels of shooting open shots. Some are open by three feet, others are open by more than 6+ feet. What Mazzulla is talking about are WIDE OPEN 3-point attempts, designated by 6+ feet or more of space. According to NBA tracking data, the Celtics are attempting 19.4 wide open 3-point attempts per game, making 41.4%, good for 2nd in the league. Last year, that number was at 16.5 attempts per game while the team made 37.6% of those attempts. Huge difference.

Boston Celtics vs Philadelphia 76ers
Photo by Matt Stone/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images
The Celtics under his watch are getting more, attempting more, and making more wide open 3’s. Whether it’s play design or the player’s making an extra pass, the concept of always trying to get the best possible 3-point attempt is being applied here in plenty. It does lead to some weird shooting nights (looking at you game-against-Knicks), but the strategy as a whole is working.

Effective Field Goal% (eFG%)
Mazzulla has referred to this multiple times as a replacement for classic FG%. Effective Field Goal% (or eFG% for short) is a really good statistic for those trying to get into the true 1st level of “advanced analytics.” It’s a statistic that adjusts FG% to account for the fact that three-point field goals count for three points while field goals only count for two points. For the nerds out there, the formula is (FG + (.5*3P))/FGA.



This formula is great to use to compare teams or players that shoot a ton of 3’s. Lucky for Mazzulla, the Celtics shoot 42 a game on average, so eFG% works great. Just from looking at the Celtics improvement in that number, you can see how much the team has highlighted it since this core came together and even more since Mazzulla has taken over: 53.4% in 2018-19, 53.1% in 2019-2020, 54.2 %in both 2020-21 and 2021-22, and finally this season, the team sits at 56.4%, good for 6th highest in the league. If you couldn’t tell, the theme is to shoot more 3’s and make more 3’s. Mazzulla ball simplified maybe too much.

Second Chance Points
This is an easy one. Second chance points come into play after the first shot of a possession is missed and a team has another shot at getting points. For Mazzulla, it’s less about the Celtics scoring second chance points, but he’s also emphasizing making sure the other team doesn’t get those 2nd chance opportunities. This ties into a few different stats, but the big one is REB Chance% and REB%.

REB% Chance% is easy; it tells you how often your team has a chance at getting a rebound. Good defensive teams with good rebounders rank highly in stats like these, so no surprise to see the Celtics rank 3rd with a 58.7% REB Chance%. Their execution of those chances then comes into play with REB% and the Celtics again rank highly at 50.9%, 6th in the league.

All of that comes back to second chance points and denying those opportunities to teams. Mazzulla ball again backs up the talk, ranking 6th in the league in opponent 2nd chance points at only 12.7 a game, tied with Denver.

Points Per Possession
PPP has taken on a much different meaning in the past 2-3 years with COVID, but the phrase has remained one of the most important advanced analytics in the NBA. Points per possession calculate just that, how many points do you average per offensive possession. For instance, if I score a 3 on one possession and then come away with nothing the next time down the floor, my PPP is 1.5.

Coach Mazzulla has referenced this in post-game press conferences numerous times, talking about how it’s important to look at your possessions over the course of a full game or season vs. one by one. It’s not a stat that tells you anything new, but it’s a good stat to show how you stack up with other teams. At 1.18, the Celtics rank 2nd in the stat, behind just the Kings and tied with the Nuggets. Spoiler alert: the Celtics are really good at basketball.

Midrange Frequency
Coach Mazzulla has referenced midrange as a way to show off shot quality and how the Celtics’ defense can force teams off the 3-point line and into less valuable shots. For instance, they are 2nd in the NBA in opponent’s shots between 5-19 feet at 27.7 FGA. Teams for the season are shooting only 43.9% on those shots and when you toss in a 34.7% from 3, you’re left with a generally good defense.

The bigger issue is that since the All-Star break, the Celtics are allowing teams to shoot 37.3% from 3 and 44.5% on shots from 5-19 feet. Not a huge difference, but over the course of 6 games, it can be the difference between a 3-3 record and a 5-1 record. The defensive plan is to force teams into worse midrange shots, but the hope is that they actually miss those shots. They don’t miss, the plan doesn’t look nearly as good (looking at you Immanuel Quickley).

The game of basketball has changed a lot in the past decade or so. As spacing and the 3-point shot has taken over, advanced analytics have stormed to the forefront of game planning. Some may think leans too hard into these numbers, but I’d rather have a coach embrace them fully than ignore them entirely. Whether it ends in an NBA title is a whole other question, but for now, just nice to have a real modern basketball team.